http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Mk1-mr2-ka...51288679527%26
This car was originally made by Paul back in 2002/2003. It is a bit of a marmite car, but I quite like it.
Printable View
http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Mk1-mr2-ka...51288679527%26
This car was originally made by Paul back in 2002/2003. It is a bit of a marmite car, but I quite like it.
Interesting colour.
(trying to follow Thumper's mother's words: If you can't say something nice, don't say nothing at all. Which is a double negative but you get my drift)
Personally, i think it is horrible but each to their own.
I also noticed this one...
http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/TOYOTA-MR2...item19de20bb73
Again, i really dont like it but it looks like good quality work and has had a lot of money thrown at it at some point.
prefer the top one it just looks so much more refined.
I much prefer the colour of the second one, in fact I love the colour of the second one. I am such a girl, just going for colour.
However the issue for me would be the fact it has supercharger decals and is not a supercharger. The engine lids are not raised and he clearly states it however the advert says " but modeled brilliantly to look like one."
The only visible exterior differences between an N/A and a SC are different rear lights and raised engine lids. They do not have those body kits on them.
I do really dislike someone having stickers on a car to imply it is a different car.
Here is the original article about the conversion
http://web.archive.org/web/200706160...om/Karfit.html
This made me smile
Quote Paul Woods
" I for one applaud any modification that makes our cars special (although fitting a 2ltr turbo may be a tad too far) and this kit certainly does that."
laughable quote really when you consider that paul's built the MRX :eek:
paul think you need to revisit this page and make some minor alterations to the text in that amazingly detailed "how to" guide :)
Snoball, I was taught to not to criticize other peoples work, When your own isn't so good.
Bill.
I didn't read that as a criticism ?????